home about

publications

in the news links sitemap site updates
FOIA
documents
about:

 

 

 

 

 

This web site is best
viewed in full screen
(1024x768) and
medium font with
Internet Explorer 5 or
higher and Netscape
6 or higher.

 


powered by
freefind.com

 


Nuclear Brief February 8, 2006

The Neither Confirm Nor Deny Policy

Although the U.S. government in 1992 announced to the world that it had removed all tactical nuclear weapons from its surface ships, attack submarines, and naval aircraft, the Navy has issued a new instruction that orders navy personnel not to tell anyone.

The new instruction, "Release of Information on Nuclear Weapons and on Nuclear Capabilities of U.S. Forces," was issued by the office of Chief of Naval Operations on February 3, 2006. It reaffirms the so-called Neither Confirm Nor Deny Policy (NCND) by directing that:

"Military members and civilian employees of the Department of the Navy shall not reveal, purport to reveal, or cause to be revealed any information, rumor, or speculation with respect to the presence or absence of nuclear weapons or components on board any specific ship, station or aircraft, either on their own initiative or in response, direct or indirect, to any inquiry."

At the same time the instruction orders navy personnel not to tell anyone that there are no nuclear weapons onboard U.S. warships, the instruction -- which is a public document available on the Navy's web site -- also confirms that it is U.S. policy not to deploy nuclear weapons on the warships:

"It is general U.S. policy not to deploy nuclear weapons aboard surface ships, naval aircraft, attack submarines, or guided missile submarines."

Guided Missile Submarines

First of Four SSGNs

The USS Ohio (SSGN-726) arrives in Puget Sound, Washington, in January 2006 following conversion from Trident ballistic missile submarine to non-nuclear guided missile submarine for Tomahawk cruise missiles and special forces.
                                      Credit: U.S. Navy

The instruction also reveals that four guided missiles submarines (SSGN) currently under

 conversion from ballistic missiles submarines (SSBN) to carry Tomahawk cruise missiles and special forces will not be carrying nuclear weapon:

"For these four ships, the submarine-launched ballistic missile capability will be replaced with a conventionally armed, guided cruise missile capability similar to that resident on attack submarines." It is U.S. policy, the instruction states, "not to deploy nuclear weapons aboard…guided missile submarines."

The Tomahawk missile also exists in a nuclear version and ever since the Navy decided to convert the four SSBNs to SSGNs it has not been officially stated that the ships will only carry conventional. The new instruction specifically states that the Tomahawks carried on the boats will be conventional.

In fact, the whole purpose of issuing OPNAVINST 5721.1F appears to be to incorporate the SSGNs into the NCND guidance. The previous version of the instruction from 1993 does not mention SSGNs.

Background

For nearly 50 years, the United States has maintained a policy of neither confirming nor denying the presented or absence of its nuclear weapons anywhere. Other nuclear powers have operated a similar policy, but the U.S. case is much better documented as a result of worldwide deployment of nuclear weapons during the Cold War and because of greater access to government information.

Officially, the policy was justified as a way to strengthen deterrence and protect individual ships and bases against sabotage. But the NCND's real use was in countless diplomatic and public affairs battles around the world to evade political and public opposition to nuclear weapons in allied and adversary countries.

Four allied countries the NCND presented a particular problem. Many of them had public policies or legislation in place that prohibited the presence of nuclear weapons on their territories, but maintaining close political and military ties with the United States was also a high priority. The United States insisted that the NCND policy was in effect when U.S. warships visited, but accepting the NCND policy also meant that the host government inevitably had to accept that nuclear weapons would come in once in a while. The governments could not admit this reality in public, however, and instead decided with various degree of luck and diplomatic elegance to "turn a blind eye" to the violation of their nuclear policy.

For a chronology of how the NCND policy was applied -- and what it meant -- read the report "The Neither Confirm Nor Deny Policy: Nuclear Diplomacy At Work."
 

© Hans M. Kristensen/Federation of American Scientists | www.nukestrat.com | 2004-2006



download documents:

» U.S. Department of the Navy, Office of the Chief of Naval Operations, "Release of Information on Nuclear Weapons and on Nuclear Capabilities of U.S. Forces," OPNAVINST 5721.1F, February 3, 2006. [0.03 MB]

» U.S. Department of the Navy, Office of the Chief of Naval Operations, "Release of Information on Nuclear Weapons and on Nuclear Capabilities of U.S. Forces," OPNAVINST 5721.1E, March 21, 1993.

background information:

» Hans M. Kristensen, "The Neither Confirm Nor Deny Policy: Nuclear Diplomacy At Work," February 2006. [0.32 MB]

» The 1988 National Election: How The NCND Triggered An Election in Denmark.

Adobe Acrobat Reader
required to view
 

 

  © Hans M. Kristensen